\begin{table}[htpb]\begin{center} \caption{Heterogeneity in the Influence of the MIL on DIL's Number of Peers, by MIL's Fertility Preferences, OLS Regressions}\label{table:table6}\begin{tabular}{lcccccc} \toprule
& \shortstack{MIL\\disapproves\\to FP}  & \shortstack{MIL\\approves\\of FP} & \shortstack{$\text{Ideal Kids}^{MIL} > $ \\ $\text{Ideal Kids}^{DIL}$} & \shortstack{$\text{Idead Kids}^{MIL}$ \\ $ \leq \text{Idead Kids}^{DIL}$} & \shortstack{$\text{Idead Sons}^{MIL} > $\\ DIL's sons} & \shortstack{$\text{Idead Sons}^{MIL}  $ \\ $\leq$ DIL's sons} \\ &  (1) & (2) & (3) & (4) & (5) & (6) \\ \midrule & \multicolumn{6}{c}{A. Outcome: \# close peers in the village}  \\ 
Lives with MIL           &      -0.160** &      -0.115*  &      -0.117** &       0.000   &      -0.127** &       0.074   \\
                         &     [0.061]   &     [0.060]   &     [0.045]   &     [0.145]   &     [0.052]   &     [0.144]   \\
Control mean             &       0.556   &       0.691   &       0.572   &       0.744   &       0.573   &       0.550   \\


  & \multicolumn{6}{l}{B. Outcome: \# close outside peers in the village} \\  
Lives with MIL           &      -0.149***&      -0.119*  &      -0.103** &      -0.169   &      -0.098** &      -0.164   \\
                         &     [0.041]   &     [0.064]   &     [0.041]   &     [0.125]   &     [0.043]   &     [0.134]   \\
Control mean             &       0.348   &       0.383   &       0.329   &       0.488   &       0.316   &       0.350   \\
N                        &         320   &         351   &         519   &         152   &         530   &         141   \\
\bottomrule \\[-5ex] \end{tabular} \end{center} \begin{tablenotes} This table reports coefficients from specification (1). Each column within a panel is a separate regression. The outcome variable is the number of closepeers a woman has in her village in Panel A and the number of such peers outside the household in Panel B. Columns (1) and (2) split the sample by whether the MIL approves of using FP or not. Columns (3) and (4) compare the number of children the MIL would like the DIL to have (Ideal KidsMIL) and the DIL's ideal number of children (Ideal KidsDIL). Columns (5) and (6) compare the number of sons the MIL would like the DIL to have (Ideal SonsMIL) and the DIL's numberof sons at the time of the survey (DIL sons). In all cases, we control for the DIL's age, years of schooling, Hindu dummy, amount of land owned by the household, and fixed effects for her caste category (SC-ST, OBC, or Other caste) and village. Control mean refers to the dependent variable mean for women who do not live with their MIL. Robust standard errors in brackets are clustered by village. \sym{*}\(p<0.1\),\sym{**}\(p<0.05\),\sym{***}\(p<0.01\). \end{tablenotes} \end{table}
